Canis ISSN: 2398-2942

Rectum: prolapse - surgical management

Synonym(s): Anorectal prolapse, everted rectum, everted anus, anal prolapse

Contributor(s): Rosa Ragni, Daniel Smeak

Introduction

  • Rectal prolapse Rectum: prolapse Rectum: prolapse 01 Rectum: prolapse 02 is protrusion of a portion of the rectum or rectal mucosa through the anus, usually caused by an underlying disorder. Just about any gastrointestinal (enteritis Enteritis: eosinophilic ) or urogenital condition (dystocia, urethral calculus Ureter: urolithiasis ) that causes tenesmus can result in rectal prolapse. The problem is most commonly seen in young dogs afflicted with endoparasitism. Laxity of the anal sphincter or perianal connective tissue (perineal hernia with rectal sacculation) may also predispose small animals to this condition. It is critical for the surgeon to be aware of predisposing cause(s) because the success of the surgery often correlates with proper treatment of the primary cause of tenesmus.
  • There are three surgical techniques designed to treat/prevent rectal prolapse (perianal pursestring suture, colopexy, and rectal resection). The choice of technique depends on the underlying condition (whether it can be successfully treated and if it is recurrent or not) and on the viability of the prolapsed tissue.
  • A thorough physical and rectal examination should be performed. Additional diagnostics such as fecal analysis Fecal analysis: overview , complete blood count Hematology: complete blood count (CBC) , chemistry panel, urinalysis and culture Urinalysis , abdominal and thoracic imaging may be required. It is critical that the primary cause of the prolapse be identified and treated.
  • Rectal prolapse must be differentiated from intussusception Intussusception. The latter must be approached from the abdomen for treatment. Insert a finger or probe alongside the prolapse: if the probe can be inserted cranially more than a few centimeters, the condition is an intussusception.
  • Treatment of the prolapse should be prompt to reduce further trauma. Extensive colorectal preoperative preparation is often not necessary.

Uses

Advantages

  • Pursestring suturesare relatively quick and easy to perform with little risk of complications. Since this is the least expensive and least invasive technique, it is usually chosen first when the condition causing the tenesmus is expected to be eradicated with medical therapy.
  • Colopexyrequires an invasive midline laparotomy Laparotomy: midline , but the technique is readily performed, with little additional risk to the patient.
  • Rectal resectionis performed outside the patients body to excise diseased tissue, so contamination of sterile tissues during surgery is minimized. Rectal resection has the advantage of removing the diseased portion of the rectum and additionally it eliminates redundant rectum, thereby decreasing the risk of re-prolapse. There is more danger of serious complications with this technique so it is performed only when absolutely necessary and with owners full understanding about the risks.

Disadvantages

  • Pursestring suturesare often unsuccessful unless the condition causing the problem is readily treatable, and tenesmus can be controlled.
  • Colopexyis an invasive treatment, and recurrence may occur if the cause of the tenesmus is not controlled.
  • Rectal resectionhas several serious postoperative complications, such as stricture formation Rectum: stricture , incontinence, and dehiscence which may be life-threatening.

Requirements

This article is available in full to registered subscribers

Sign up now to purchase a 30 day trial, or Login

Preparation

This article is available in full to registered subscribers

Sign up now to purchase a 30 day trial, or Login

Procedure

This article is available in full to registered subscribers

Sign up now to purchase a 30 day trial, or Login

Aftercare

This article is available in full to registered subscribers

Sign up now to purchase a 30 day trial, or Login

Outcomes

This article is available in full to registered subscribers

Sign up now to purchase a 30 day trial, or Login

Prognosis

  • The prognosis after surgery with all techniques is generally good provided the primary cause of the prolapse has been managed successfully, straining is controlled, and the appropriate surgical procedure was performed correctly.
  • For example, in a young patient with endoparasites, successful treatment of the parasite and temporary pursestring suture of a viable prolapse is usually curative. On the other hand, a dog with permanent anal laxity following anorectal surgery (which is usually untreatable and permanent), the prognosis is guarded at best since recurrence is likely.

Further Reading

Publications

Refereed papers

  • Recent references from PubMed and VetMedResource.
  • Popovich C A, Holt D, Bright R (1994) Colopexy as a treatment for rectal prolapse in dogs and cats: a retrospective study of 14 casesVet Surg 23 (2), 115-118 PubMed.

Other sources of information

  • Aronson L (2003) Rectum and Anus. In: Slatter D H editor, 3rd edition Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. W B Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 686-688.


ADDED